强制性侦查措施的法律规制与法律监督

李建明

强制性侦查措施的法律规制与法律监督

Legal Regulationand Legal Supervision of Compulsory Investigation Measure


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:李建明
    单位:南京师范大学法学院
    中文关键词:刑事侦查;强制性侦查措施;法律规制;法律监督
    英文关键词:criminal investigation;compulsory investigation measure;legal regulation;legal supervision
    中文摘要:
    不需要得到相对人自愿配合而直接实施的侦查措施为强制性侦查措施。强制性侦查措施具有正当性,同时也具有侵害公民基本权益的弊端。为避免或减轻强制性侦查措施对公民权利造成侵害,需要通过法律规范强制性侦查措施,同时需要加强对强制性侦查措施的法律监督。目前我国强制性侦查措施的法律规制严重不足,对于强制性侦查措施的法律监督局限于对逮捕等强制措施适用的监督,对搜查、扣押、冻结等大量强制性侦查措施尚未形成有效的监督机制。强化对于强制性侦查措施的法律监督,需要通过立法完善强制性侦查措施的规范体系,同时也有赖于检察机关改革、优化侦查监督的工作机制。
    英文摘要:
    Compulsory investigation measures can be implemented directly by investigation agencies without the voluntary cooperation of the relative persons. As necessary and important tools to expose and punish the crimes, the compulsory investigation measures have legitimacy, but still have the disadvantage of infringing the basic rights of citizens. To avoid or alleviate this disadvantage, legislation should be enacted to regulate these measures, the principles and procedures to apply these measures should be set and the legal supervision over these measures should be strengthened. In China, the current legal regulation of compulsory investigation measures suffers severe weakness, and for many measures there exist no laws for regulation. Accordingly, the legal supervision over compulsory investigation measures is limited to the compulsory measures such as arrest, and the effective supervision mechanism regarding many other compulsory investigation measures such as search, seizure and freezing has not been established yet. The legislation of compulsory investigation measures lags seriously, making the non-normative application possible and the prosecution agency get into the trouble of having no laws to follow. In order to strengthen the legal supervision over compulsory investigation measures, we should improve the normative system through legislation, reform the prosecution agency and optimize the investigation supervision working mechanism. That is, we should set up and improve the judicial review system, the record censorship system, the prosecution guiding investigation system and the citizen complaint system, so as to elevate the strength and actual effectiveness of the supervision over compulsory investigation measures.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成