涉外民事关系法律适用法若干争议问题
王胜明涉外民事关系法律适用法若干争议问题
Some Controversial Problems concerning to the Law of Law Application of Foreign Civil Relations
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：王胜明
单位：全国人大常委会法制工作委员会
中文关键词：涉外民事关系法律适用;最密切联系原则;强制性规定;规避;国际条约
英文关键词：law application of foreign civil relations;the theory of close connection;mandatory provision;evasion;the international treaty
中文摘要：
不宜在涉外民事关系法律适用法中就什么是“涉外”作出规定。最密切联系原则的第二层含义，即确定适用的法律与该涉外民事关系不具有密切联系的，则适用与该涉外民事关系具有最密切联系的法律，有可能妨碍涉外民事关系法律适用法的正确适用。涉外民事关系法律适用法第4条中的强制性规定主要是指我国刑法和行政法、经济法中的强制性规定。涉外民事关系法律适用法对规避未作明确规定，但明确规定不适用反致。涉外民事关系法律适用法允许当事人协议选择动产物权的法律适用，有一定的考虑。鉴于国际条约的复杂性，涉外民事关系法律适用法未规定国际条约的适用问题。
英文摘要：
It is not appropriate to prescribe the definition of the foreign civil relation in the Law of Law Application of Foreign Civil Relations. The second meaning of the theory of close connection, that is, if the law to be applied does not have close connection with the foreign civil relation, then the law which has close connection should be applied, may interfere with the correct application of the said Law. The mandatory provision prescribed in Article 4 of the Law is mainly the mandatory provision in the criminal law, the administrative law and the economic law in our country. The Law has no definite provision about evasion, but provides against the application of the conflict law of other countries clearly. The Law allows the parties to select the applied law concerning the chattels by agreement, which has certain considerations. Due to the complexity of the international treaty, the Law does not prescribe the application of the international treaty.
全文阅读： 点击下载
