案例指导制度下的法律推理及其规则

黄泽敏,张继成

案例指导制度下的法律推理及其规则

Legal Reasoning and Its Rules under the Case Guidance System


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:黄泽敏,张继成
    单位:中南财经政法大学法学院法;中南财经政法大学法学院
    中文关键词:案例指导制度;指导性案例;法律推理;同案判断方法;同判形成规则
    英文关键词:case guidance system;guiding case;legal reasoning;method of judging the similar case;rule of forming the similar judgment
    中文摘要:
    与制定法传统下的法律推理不同,案例指导制度下的法律推理由法律规则、指导性案例、案件事实以及判决结论四个要素构成。在这种思维模式中,由于对待决案件与指导性案例作出是否同案的判断以及如何形成同判是整个法律推理的论证重点,判定两者是否属于相同案件以及如何作出相同判决的方法自然成为这种法律推理的核心方法。案例指导制度下法律推理的规则主要包括:基本参照规则、实现同案同判的认识规则、断定同案的判断规则、形成同判的约束规则、回归规则以及指导性案例选编的编写规则。上述推理形式和推理规则的系统作用是案例指导制度下法律推理得以正确进行的基础和保障。
    英文摘要:
    The legal reasoning of the case guidance system is the effective way to treat the similar case equally. It not only reflects the particular form of judging thought in the case guidance system, but also takes the way of deciding the similar case as the most important method of legal reasoning. Different from the model of the traditional legal reasoning, the legal reasoning of the case guidance system consists of four parts, that is, the legal rule, the guiding case, the legal fact and the conclusion of judgment. In this model, whether the pending case is similar to the guiding case and how to make a similar judgment to the similar case are the main points to be demonstrated, thus the method to decide the similar case and to make the similar judgment is the key point in the legal argument. Rules of legal reasoning of the case guidance system should be established to guarantee that the similar case get the similar judgment, which include the foundational referential rule, the epistemological rule to realize "similar case, similar judgment", the rule to decide whether the pending case is similar to the guiding cases, the binding rule to form the similar judgment, the regression rule, and the editorial rule of the guiding cases. As a matter of course, without such a theory of legal reasoning, the operation of the case guidance system is impossible. The system function of the above forms and rules of reasoning is the foundation and safeguard of the correct legal reasoning under the case guidance system.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 刑事诉讼法学研究的转型以刑事

    我国以往关于禁止双重危险原则的研究表明,刑事诉讼法学研究需要转型。刑事诉讼法学研究的转型首先要确定方向,即遵循刑事诉讼的发展规

  • 法官责任制度的三种模式

    随着司法制度的不断发展和完善,我国的法官责任制度逐渐形成了三种模式.其中,结果责任模式发端于错案责任追究制,后被纳入违法审判责任

  • 论选择性要素的认识错误

    关于选择性要素的认识错误,首要的问题在于选择性要素是不是独立的客观构成要件要素。从罪刑规范的角度看,法条描述的用语不等于构成要