律令法体系向律例法体系的转换

刘笃才

律令法体系向律例法体系的转换

On the Transfer from the System of Statutes and Decreesto the System of Statutes and Cases


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:刘笃才
    单位:辽宁大学法学院
    中文关键词:律令法制;律令法体系;律例法体系
    英文关键词:system of statutes and decrees;system of statutes and cases
    中文摘要:
    律令法体系对于分析中国古代法制史是一个重要概念,如果与律例法体系的概念相互配合将会对研究工作更加有利。战国秦汉至隋唐时期的法体系以律与令为主 体,是为律令法体系。明清时期例与律成为法体系的主体,可以名之为律例法体系。律例法体系取代律令法体系是中国古代法制的重要发展。两者的转换使得法律史上长期积累起来的一些矛盾得到了解决。
    英文摘要:
    It has been a consensus in the circle of legal history that the system of statutes and decrees is an important concept. The system of statutes and decrees is a legal system mainly consisting in Statutes and decrees. It existed in the period of Zhan’guo, Qinhan, Weijin, Sui and Tang Dynasties in ancient China. After the development in Song and Yuan dynasties, statutes and cases became the main components of the legal system, hence the system of statutes and cases. The collaboration between the two-the system of statutes and decrees and the system of statutes and cases-is very useful in analyzing the historical evolution of the ancient Chinese legal system. The fundamental cause of the transfer from the system of statutes and decrees to the system of statutes and cases is that the law must meet the huge socio-economic changes occurring in Tang and Song dynasties. The transfer is a three-folded story. First, the transfer was a long and complicated process, during which cases initially considered as alien things were recognized and absorbed into the legal system, and "grew barbarically" under the specific historical conditions. Secondly, traditional legal system began to change dramatically and decline from the peak of prosperity. Finally, cases gradually absorbed "decrees". It is an important development in ancient China that the system of statutes and cases replaced the system of statutes and decrees. Statutes were the main form of law while cases were complementary. This structure not only adapted to the contemporary economic and social system, but also properly solved some contradictions accumulated in ancient Chinese legal system:it helped to resolve the contradiction between the simpleness and complexity of legal forms, coordinate conflict between sentiment and law in the judicial process, and promote the combination of reason and experience in the legislative process.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成