比较视野下的中国信息公开立法

杨永纯,高一飞

比较视野下的中国信息公开立法

Chinese Legislation on Information Disclosure in Comparative Perspective


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:杨永纯,高一飞
    单位:西南政法大学中国-东盟法律研究中心;西南政法大学
    中文关键词:信息自由;信息公开;最大限度的公开;信息公开法
    英文关键词:freedom of information;information disclosure;maximum;publication law on information disclosure
    中文摘要:
    公众对信息自由和知情的诉求,行政机关的职能保密和习惯保密,这二者构成了我国现阶段失序性社会纠纷中舆论冲突的主要矛盾。这类舆论矛盾的解决溢出了《政府信息公开条例》的程序性和技术化范畴。信息自由权是基本人权,信息公开是政府的义务。作为一种国际趋势,最大限度公开是信息公开的基本原则,由于公开与保密界限确定的复杂性,立法者应当尽可能将公开的范围明确化,避免严肃的法律变成可以让政府机关“在各自职责范围内确定”并选择“重点公开”内容的指导性意见。我国应当从信息公开的原则、信息主体范围、信息公开手段、知情权救济机制等方面完善信息公开制度,制定统一的信息公开法。
    英文摘要:
    In present China, the appealing for the freedom and publication of information by the general public and keeping functional and habitual confidentiality by administrative organs constitutes the major contradiction in public opinion conflicts in social disputes. The resolution of these conflicts has exceeded the procedural and technical requirements of Regulations on Disclosure of Government Information. On the one hand, the right to freedom of information is one of the basic human rights, and information disclosure is an obligation of administrative organs, which has become an international trend. On the other hand, our Constitution has recognized the right to know, which can be the adequate basis to the legislation on information disclosure. Therefore, it is urgent to make a law on information disclosure to impose restrictions on government's dominate and broad confidentiality, regulate ways by which the general public get information, and maintain peaceful social order.The maximum publication should be set as the basic principle of information disclosure by Chinese legislation, and the public institutions should be defined as the subjects to publicize the information through legal procedures. Given the complexity of the issues involved in defining the boundaries between publicity and confidentiality, the legislators should clarify the scope and method of publication as far as possible to prevent the serious law becoming a kind of guidance by which different levels of administrative organs can choose the emphasis of publicity within the range of their respective duties and responsibilities. In comparative perspective, researches on the methods, scope, subjects and right-relief mechanism of information disclosure represent the future trend of Chinese legislation on information disclosure.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成