最高人民法院关于无效行政行为的探索

叶必丰

最高人民法院关于无效行政行为的探索

Exploration on Invalid Administrative Action by Supreme People’s Court


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:叶必丰
    单位:上海交通大学法学院
    中文关键词:无效行政行为;重大明显瑕疵;最高人民法院
    英文关键词:invalid administrative action;great and significant flaws;Supreme People’s Court
    中文摘要:
    最高人民法院从司法审查引发出对无效行政行为制度的探索,虽没有使用“自始没有任何法律效力”和“无效”等概念,却在民事诉讼领域形成了有关基础行为的构成要件,在对行政行为的司法审查中形成了重大明显瑕疵的类型化和明显性判断标准,并形成了排除具有重大明显瑕疵行政行为公定力、相对人拘束力和司法强制执行力的无效行政行为制度雏形,为我国今后立法积累了丰富的素材。从最高人民法院的探索轨迹及其重大明显瑕疵的类型化,可以发现无效行政行为规则的鲜明中国特色,司法的制度生成意义和生成机制。
    英文摘要:
    The system of invalid administrative action has not been established in China's written law yet, but the Supreme People's Court has made long-term exploration on it in individual cases and judicial interpretations based on the need of judicial review. Although the exploration did not use notions like "void ab initio" or "invalidation", it was actually practicing the basic contents and functions of invalid administrative action system.First of all, the substantive administrative action that can subsume case facts and legal effects could be used as criteria of judging fundamental actions in civil actions, if there existed mandatory legal provisions or agreements made by two parties. Secondly, in civil, criminal and administrative actions, the Supreme People's Court insisted that administrative action with great and significant flaws shall not restrict relevant judicial sentences, arbitration decisions and administrative actions. It also shall not restrict citizens, legal persons and other social organizations, and could not be enforced by judiciary. Thirdly, the Supreme People's Court discovered criteria for judging invalid administrative action, including obvious lack of substantiation, obvious lack of law and regulation basis, and other obvious illegal circumstances that damage legitimate rights and interests of persons subject to enforcement.The practice and exploration by the Supreme People's Court has formed a system embryo of invalid administrative action, and provided abundant materials for formal legislation in the future. Viewing from the exploring path of the Supreme People's Court and the categorization of great and significant flaws, we can find distinctive Chinese characteristics in the rules of invalid administrative action, and the significance of system generation and generating mechanism in judiciary.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成