知识产权法的制度创新本质与知识创新目标

吴汉东

知识产权法的制度创新本质与知识创新目标

Essence of Institutional Innovation and Purpose of Knowledge Innovation of Intellectual Property Law


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:吴汉东
    单位:中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心
    中文关键词:知识产权法;制度创新;知识创新价值;知识产权战略
    英文关键词:intellectual property law;institutional innovation;value of knowledge innovation;strategy of intellectual property right
    中文摘要:
    创新是知识产权法的历史过程与时代使命。知识产权法的创新意义,表现在其本身的制度创新与所追求的知识创新两个方面。知识产权法产生、变革和发展的历史,即为科技、文化创新与法律制度创新相互作用、相互促进的历史。理想的知识产权制度应是持续激励创新的制度,也是自身不断创新的制度。现代知识产权法存在可能发生的“制度风险”,影响或制约着创新发展目标的实现。国家与社会事务的管理者具有“政治企业家”的角色担当,作为创新制度的最大供给者,应在知识产权法的主体意识层面、制度设计层面以及社会运行层面作出理性反思和积极应对。
    英文摘要:
    Innovation is considered the historical process as well as the purpose of the development of intellectual property law. Innovation in intellectual property law has two aspects of meaning, i.e., innovation in the institution itself and innovation in the knowledge pursued by the institution. The history of the emergence and development of intellectual property law is also a history of interaction and mutual promotion between science and technology, cultural innovation and system of law. Though innovation has been seen as the essence of intellectual property law, the law has some inherent "institutional risks" because its natural endowment for innovation is subjected to the international influence of economic globalization and challenged by knowledge revolution in the contemporary society. An ideal intellectual property right system should be a system that continuously inspires innovation while at the same time continuously innovates on itself. The administrators of state and social affairs should play the role of "political entrepreneurs". As the main source of innovation system, they should make rational reflections on and active responses to the existing problems at the levels of subject consciousness, institutional design and social operation. In the historical development of innovation, intellectual property law has always been treated by modern states, such as the United Kingdom, the United States and South Korea, as the model law for promoting intellectual innovation and as an institutional civilization that forms part of the national strategy during periods of social transition. Currently China is becoming a world power. As such, it should pay attention to institutional building and policy improvement and take intellectual property right as "the driving force of innovation and development" in its fundamental strategies.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成