检察人员对分类管理改革的立场———以问卷调查为基础
程金华检察人员对分类管理改革的立场———以问卷调查为基础
An Empirical Analysis of the Procurator's Attitude to the Reform of Classified Management of Judicial Personnel in China
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：程金华
单位：华东政法大学国际金融法律学院
中文关键词：司法改革;司法人员分类管理;利益相关者;实证研究
英文关键词：judicial reform;classified management of judicial personnel;stakeholders;empirical study
中文摘要：
对全国7省市13家中基层检察院1748位检察人员进行问卷调查发现,受访者对检察人员分类管理改革所面临的现存问题和改革必要性有较高的共识度,但在具体的改革举措上,不同岗位的受访者的改革立场存在明显差异.从数据分析结论看,今后在司法人员分类管理改革的操作方面,应当注重司法系统内外的联动性,把拓宽党政部门对司法部门的人财物支持作为分类管理改革的根本来抓,而把员额制的“入额”问题放在改革的技术层面来操作.在改革方法论方面,司法改革顶层决策者要通过科学的问卷调查等实证分析方法,来系统了解司法人员针对改革诸多事项的具体态度与不同看法,并在此基础上有针对性地进行利益相关者动员,以达到凝聚改革共识的效果.
英文摘要：
The paper is an empirical study on procuratorial officers' evaluation of the proposed reform of classified management of procuratorial personnel in China, based on a nationwide survey of 1748 officials working in 13 Chinese procuratorates. Most respondents agree that the current personnel management system used by the Chinese procuratorate system is badly inefficient and it is needed to be reformed immediately. In particular, the current system is inefficient because it gives much more occupation returns to administrative officers than to procurators and, as a result, many legal talents end up becoming an administrative bureaucrat instead of being a law enforcer in the system. Also, most of them agree that there are multiple reasons for the fact that this inefficient system has hardly been changed in the past decades. Secondly, different groups of the respondents have different views on the proposed solution to the problems in this classified management system, which classifies all officers into three categories, i.e., procurators, administrative officers, and supporting staffs. Based on empirical analysis of the survey data, to deploy the proposed reform efficiently, the reformer shall take a strategic action to bring more outside resources to support the judicial system and, simultaneously, improve operational skills to resolve all kinds of “enter-into-the-quota-system” problems. Methodologically, the reformer shall also systematically learn about judicial officers' different viewpoints on the undergoing reform through scientific methods, such as surveys, in order to mobilize these stakeholders to support the reform more efficiently.
全文阅读： 点击下载
