公司属人法的确定:真实本座主义的未来

邢钢

公司属人法的确定:真实本座主义的未来

The Real Seat Theory in the Personal Law of the Corporation


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:邢钢
    单位:北京师范大学法学院
    中文关键词:公司属人法;真实本座主义;内部事务主义;涉外民事关系法律适用法
    英文关键词:personal law of the corporation;the real seat theory;the internal affairs theory;the Law of the People's Republic of China on Choice of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relationships
    中文摘要:
    真实本座主义与内部事务主义是公司属人法确定的两大基本理论。真实本座主义旨在保护公司真实本座所在地国的相关利益和维护交易安全,但也限制了公司的自由设立和流动。随着经济全球化、一体化的发展与公司自治思想理念的深入,公司属人法确定的标准将逐渐演变为以内部事务主义为主、真实本座主义为辅的混合适用模式。我国涉外民事关系法律适用法的规范立场游移不定,司法实践很有可能走向真实本座主义。改进之路在于明确中国法律的规范立场,赋予“法人主营业地”法律含义或者证明的方法,将“主营业地法律”的适用严格限定在保护第三人利益或者社会公共利益的条件下。
    英文摘要:
    The real seat theory and internal affairs theory are the two basic theories on the personal law of the corporation. The real seat theory is aimed at protecting the relevant interests of the corporation's real seat and ensuring the security of the transaction, but it also restricts the free establishment and movement of the corporation. With economic globalization, the integration of development and the deepening of the concept of corporate autonomy, the personal law of the corporation has gradually evolved into a mixed mode of application based on the internal affairs theory and supplemented by the real seat theory. While realizing corporate autonomy, this mode also plays a role in protecting interests and ensuring transaction security. With the uncertainty of the normative position of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Choice of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relationships, it is very likely for judicial practice in China to turn completely towards the real seat theory. The road to improvement lies in clarifying the normative position of Chinese law, giving legal meaning to or providing a method of proving the "legal person's main place of business", and limiting the ground for "the application of the law of the corporation's main place of business" strictly to the protection of the interests of third parties or public interests.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成