个人信息保护:从个人控制到社会控制

高富平

个人信息保护:从个人控制到社会控制

Protection of Personal Information: from Individual Control to Social Control


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:高富平
    单位:华东政法大学
    中文关键词:个人信息;个人信息保护;隐私保护;个人信息社会控制
    英文关键词:personal information;personal information protection;privacy protection;social control of personal information
    中文摘要:
    欧洲基于对人的尊严的保护,美国基于对个人自由的保护,形成了个人信息的个人控制论,以实现个人自治,保护人的基本权利。但个人信息保护权并不是一项全面的、绝对的支配权。个人信息不仅关涉个人利益,而且关涉他人和整个社会利益,个人信息具有公共性和社会性。传统的个人信息个人控制理论是建立在个人主义观念下,忽视了个人信息的社会性、公共性,不仅不能全面反映个人信息的法律属性,而且不能适应大数据时代个人信息利用的新环境和新方式。这预示着个人信息保护应从个人控制走向社会控制。我国应当从个人信息的法律属性出发,以社会控制论指导个人信息保护立法,建立平衡个人利益和社会整体利益的、适应大数据时代的个人信息保护制度。
    英文摘要:
    The theory of individual control over personal information, which is based on the principle of human dignity in Europe and the principle of personal freedom in the U.S., aims at protecting the citizen's fundamental rights and personal autonomy. The right to the protection of personal information, however, is not an independent and absolute right, but an institutional arrangement at the level of fundamental rights. Personal information has social and public properties because it concerns not only the interests the individual whose personal information is to be protected, but also the interests of other individuals and the society as a whole. Because of its individualistic foundation and its disregard for the social and public properties of personal information, the traditional theory cannot fully reflect the properties of personal information and adapt to the new situation and methods of the use of personal information in the age of big data. This means that the theory of personal information should undergo a transition from one based on personal control to one based on social control. China should develop a new personal information protection system adapted to the big data era by taking the legal properties of personal information as the starting point and the social control theory as the legislative guidance and striking a balance between individual interests and the interests of the society.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成