集体法益的刑法保护及其边界

孙国祥

集体法益的刑法保护及其边界

Criminal Law Protection of Collective Legal Interest and Its Boundary


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:孙国祥
    单位:南京大学法学院
    中文关键词:法益;集体法益;个人法益
    英文关键词:legal interest;personal legal interest;collective legal interest
    中文摘要:
    法益的本源性价值在于保护个人自由,集体法益的核心则是维护秩序。集体法益在形式上与个人自由是此消彼长的关系,但二者并非完全对立。真正和稳定的个人自由,只有在社会共同体中通过各种制度性安排才能实现。自由的内在逻辑决定了,刑法保护集体法益通常也是在维护个人自由,是自由发展的必要外在条件。传统上以个人法益保护为中心的刑法,无法有效回应现代社会的各种风险和挑战,于是集体法益的保护在现代刑法中呈现扩张趋势。面对这一现象,不应过于夸大集体法益的抽象性、模糊性,从而全盘否定集体法益扩张的必要性和正当性。不过,集体法益也极具工具性扩张潜能,对集体法益的扩张仍需警惕。通过嵌入个人法益因素并以此作为刑法保护集体法益的“门槛”,可以适度消解集体法益与个人法益的紧张关系。
    英文摘要:
    The original value of legal interest lies in the protection of individual freedom and the core of collective legal interest is to maintain order. Collective legal interest appears to be in an entanglement with personal freedom, but they are not completely opposite to each other. Real and stable individual freedom can be realized only through various institutional arrangements in society. The internal logic of freedom determines that, by protecting collective legal interests, the criminal law usually also upholds individual freedom and constitutes the necessary external social conditions for free development. Because the traditional criminal law, which is centered on the protection of personal legal interest, cannot effectively respond to the various risks and challenges of modern social life, the protection of collective legal interest is expanding in modern criminal law. It is not advisable to exaggerate the abstractness and ambiguity of collective legal interest and completely deny the necessity and legitimacy of criminal law expansion. However, collective legal interest is not only the interest of the people, but also has a potential of instrumental extension. The image and function of collective legal interest still need cautious thinking. The ease of the tension between collective and individual legal interests can be achieved by embedding factors of personal legal interest as an entry-level condition for criminal law protection, so as to highlight the contours and boundaries of collective legal interests in a society ruled by law. In this sense, collective legal interest can also play a critical role in preventing the over-expansion of criminal law protection.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成