比例原则位阶秩序的司法适用

蒋红珍

比例原则位阶秩序的司法适用

Judicial Application of the Hierarchical Order in the Principle of Proportionality


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:蒋红珍
    单位:上海交通大学凯原法学院
    中文关键词:比例原则;位阶秩序;司法适用;审查强度;司法与行政
    英文关键词:principle of proportionality; hierarchical order; judicial application; intensity of review; judicature and administration
    中文摘要:
    位阶秩序构成比例原则的规范内涵和操作路径,为比例原则调整目的与手段关系提供了重要基础。与学理建构的“三阶论”不同,我国司法实践中的比例原则,至少存在位阶秩序的“全阶式适用”“截取式适用”“抽象式适用”三种类型。位阶秩序在司法实践中的多样化呈现,既与分支原则的独立性和附属性有关,也与位阶秩序构成论的自身特点有关。分支原则的“显性”与“隐匿”,在某种程度上反映着司法审查介入行政判断的意愿强弱。近年来,司法审查强度及其界定标准已在我国司法实践中得到发展,对比例原则的本土适用产生影响。从位阶秩序适用的多样模式到司法审查强度的多元选择,代表着比例原则在我国司法适用中的未来发展趋势。
    英文摘要:
    Hierarchical order constitutes the normative connotation and operational path of the principle of proportionality and provides an important foundation for adjusting the relationship between the purpose and the means of this principle. Different from the theoretically constructed “three-order model”, there are at least three types of hierarchical order in the principle of proportionality in Chinese judicial practice, that are “full application of three steps”, “intercepted application of necessity principle” and “abstract application of proportionality doctrine as a whole”. The diversification of hierarchical order in judicial practice is related not only to the independence and subordination of sub-principles of proportionality, but also to the characteristics of hierarchical order theory itself. The “explicit” nature and “hidden” nature of the hierarchical order structure adopted in individual cases also reflect to some extent the willingness of judicial organs to intervene in administrative decisions through judicial review. In recent years, the intensity of judicial review and its definition standards have been developed in Chinese judicial practice, thus influencing the local application of the principle of proportionality. In the future, the principle of proportionality will develop from diversified modes of application of the hierarchical order to multiple choices of the intensity of judicial review.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成