合宪性视角下的成片开发征收及其标准认定

程雪阳

合宪性视角下的成片开发征收及其标准认定

The Constitutionality and Substantive Standards of Land Expropriation for Tract Development


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:程雪阳
    单位:苏州大学王健法学院
    中文关键词:成片开发征收;公共利益;交易成本;合宪性;实体标准
    英文关键词:land expropriation for tract development; public interest; transaction cost; constitutionality; substantive standard
    中文摘要:
    2019年修正的土地管理法建立了公益项目征收和成片开发征收两种土地征收制度。成片开发征收制度虽然饱受争议,其基本制度框架却可以通过现行宪法为征收制度设定的“内容规定性规范”和“边界控制性规范”的检验。要确保成片开发征收的制度内容具备合宪性,相关解释性立法必须将其实体标准严格限定为属于“特别重大的公共利益”需要的建设项目。结合交易成本理论,省级以上的经济开发区建设、特定的城中村改造、以公益性建设为主的综合开发等特定建设项目类型,符合“特别重大的公共利益”标准,可以适用成片开发征收制度。但上述类型中的具体建设项目能否适用成片开发征收,还需通过定量分析、举证、说明理由等途径加以论证。
    英文摘要:
    The Chinese Land Administration Law, which was amended in August 2019, establishes two kinds of land expropriation: land expropriation for specific public interest projects and land expropriation for tract development. Although the system of land expropriation for tract development is highly controversial, its basic institutional framework is able to pass the “content prescriptive norms” test and the “boundary control norms” test established in the Constitution for the land expropriation system. To ensure the constitutionality of the institutional content of appropriation of land for tract development, the relevant interpretative legislations must strictly define the substantive standard as construction project needed for “particularly important public interests”. According to the theory of transaction cost, the system of land expropriation for tract development can be applied to specific types of construction projects, such as “construction of economic development zones approved by a provincial government or the central government”, “rebuilding of specific villages in cities” and “comprehensive development projects focusing on public welfare construction”, which meet the standard of “particularly important public interests”. However, whether land expropriation for tract development can be applied to the above mentioned specific construction projects is still a question that needs to be demonstrated by such means as quantitative analysis, production of evidence and giving reasons.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成