全球金融治理的合法性困局及其应对
廖凡全球金融治理的合法性困局及其应对
The Legitimacy Dilemma of Global Financial Governance and Countermeasures
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：廖凡
单位：1. 中国社会科学院国际合作局;2. 最高人民法院“一带一路”司法研究基地
中文关键词：全球金融治理;二十国集团;软法;全球金融法;多边主义
英文关键词：global financial governance; Group of Twenty; soft law; global financial law; multilateralism
中文摘要：
全球金融治理的合法性困局在全球金融危机中充分暴露并引起广泛关注。全球金融治理存在三个突出特点，即危机驱动、内在失衡和非正式性。全球金融治理的合法性困局与这三个特点紧密相联，表现为“民主赤字”问题、正当程序问题和规则效力问题。后危机时代，在二十国集团的主导和推动下，国际社会和有关机构从增加主体代表性、强化程序规范性、提升规则权威性等方面尝试“破局”并有所收获，但并未解决全部问题。晚近以来，美国日益突显的霸权主义、单边主义和“逆全球化”倾向，使得全球金融治理的合法性面临新的挑战。未来应当坚定遵循多边主义原则，改革完善既有多边金融治理体系，建立健全新兴国家主导的治理机构和机制，强化相关议题设置能力，并在反思国际规则“软”“硬”之别的基础上，平衡全球金融治理的合法性与实效性。
英文摘要：
The legitimacy dilemma of global financial governance was fully revealed and drew widespread attention in the global financial crisis. Global financial governance has three defining features, i.e., being crisis-driven, inherently imbalanced, and informal. Closely related to these three features, the legitimacy dilemma of global financial governance unfolds as the “democracy deficit” problem, due process problem, and the validity problem. In the post-crisis era, dominated and urged by the Group of Twenty, the international society and the relevant bodies tried to break the dilemma by improving the representation of the bodies, strengthening the normalization of the procedures, and enhancing the authority of the rules. Those efforts, albeit fruitful, did not solve all the problems. Recently, the growing tendency towards hegemonism, unilateralism and anti-globalization on the part of the United States has posed new challenges to global financial governance. In the future, the international community should firmly stick to the principle of multilateralism, reform the existing multilateral financial governance system, establish and improve such governance bodies and mechanisms as dominated by the emerging countries, enhance the topic-setting ability of the emerging great powers, and balance the legitimacy and effectiveness of global financial governance on the basis of rethinking the “softness” and “hardness” of the international rules.
全文阅读： 点击下载
