法律规范合宪性解释的方法论构造

刘召成

法律规范合宪性解释的方法论构造

Methodological Structure of Constitutionality Interpretation of Legal Norms


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:刘召成
    单位:天津大学法学院
    中文关键词:合宪性解释;目的解释;合宪性判断;合宪性续造
    英文关键词:constitutionality interpretation of law; teleological interpretation; judgment of constitutionality; constitutional renewal
    中文摘要:
    合宪性解释旨在寻求解释者对于立法自由权的尊重义务与对于宪法基本价值的尊重义务之间的调和与妥协,确保立法者的意愿在宪法允许的可能范围内得到最大程度的实现。为尊重立法机关的立法自由权,不可要求法律规范在逻辑上与宪法规范保持一致,只能要求其在价值评价上保持一致,故合宪性解释并非体系解释方法,而是从体系性目的解释中分离出的独立解释方法。合宪性解释具有确定的论辩效力上的优先性,可压制经典解释方法的解释倾向而在解释结论上得到优先实现,其方法论构造与基于宪法的解释明显不同,后者并非优先性解释方法而是衡量性解释方法。为达成法律规范解释结论与宪法基本价值相合的结果,固然可以对法律规范的文义予以扩张或限缩,但基于对立法自由权的尊重,不得排除或篡改文义的实质核心方面。
    英文摘要:
    Constitutionality interpretation of law seeks the reconciliation and compromise between the interpreter's obligation to respect the legislative power and his obligation to respect the basic values of the constitution, so as to ensure that the legislator's will can be realized to the maximum extent within the scope of the constitution. To respect the legislative power, legal norms should not be required to be logically consistent with constitutional norms, but only be required to be consistent with constitutional norms in value evaluation. Therefore, constitutionality interpretation of law is not a method of logical systematic interpretation, but an independent interpretation method separated from systematic teleological interpretation. Compared with the classical interpretation methods, constitutionality interpretation method has a definite priority in the effectiveness of argument, which can suppress the explanatory tendency of classical interpretation methods and be realized firstly in the conclusion of interpretation. Its methodological structure differs significantly from that of constitution-based legal interpretation, which is not an interpretation method of priority, but an interpretation method of measurement. To realize the compatibility between interpretation conclusion of legal norms and the basic values of the constitution, the literal meaning of legal norms can be expanded or limited. However, the substantive aspects of the literal meaning may not be excluded or tampered with, so as to respect the legislative power.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成