民事诉讼撤销原判决之程序违法事由

占善刚

民事诉讼撤销原判决之程序违法事由

Procedural Violation Cause for the Revocation of Original Judgment


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:占善刚
    单位:武汉大学环境法研究所、法学院
    中文关键词:程序违法;撤销原判;因果关系;严重违反法定程序
    英文关键词:procedural violation; revocation of original judgment; causation; serious violation of statutory procedure
    中文摘要:
    在民事诉讼中,程序违法乃当事人不服判决的原因。二审法院撤销原判决应以程序违法与判决结论之间有因果关系为要件,这不仅是判决理由没有既判力的内在要求,也是对上诉以纠正错误裁判为目的的必然回应。现行民事诉讼法将“严重违反法定程序”作为撤销原判的程序违法事由,不仅未能因应当事人的不服,也抹煞了撤销原判决与发回重审之间应有的功能界限,侵蚀了当事人的上诉利益。撤销原判决的程序违法事由应回归“原判决违反法定程序,可能影响案件正确判决”之立法设计。程序违法与判决结论之间因果关系的认定采“可能性”标准,“民诉法解释”中规定的“严重违反法定程序”具有不可反驳地推定程序违法与判决结论之间有因果关系之意义。
    英文摘要:
    In civil litigation, procedural violation is one of the reasons for a party's refusal to accept the judgment. The revocation of the original judgement by the appeal court should be based on the causal relationship between the procedural violation and the judgment, which is both the inherent requirement of the principle that the judgment reason has no res judicata and the inevitable response to the appeal for the purpose of correcting the wrong judgment. The current Civil Procedure Law, by taking “serious violation of statutory procedure” as the procedural violation cause of revocation of the original judgment, not only fails to respond to the parties' dissatisfaction, but also obliterates the functional boundary between revocation of the original judgment and remand for retrial, thereby eroding the appeal interests of the parties. The procedure violation cause for the revocation of original judgment should return to its original legislative design, namely “in the original judgment a violation of the prescribed procedure may have affected the correctness of the judgment”. The standard of “possibility” should be adopted to determine the causal relationship between procedural violation and the judgment. The “serious violation of statutory procedure” stipulated in the People's Supreme Court's Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law can be irrefutable presumption of the causal relationship between procedural violation and judgment.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成