法学研究中裁判文书运用的方法论检讨——以刑事法文献为例的内容分析
何挺法学研究中裁判文书运用的方法论检讨——以刑事法文献为例的内容分析
A Methodological Review on the Use of Judgment Documents in Jurisprudential Research
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：何挺
单位：
中文关键词：裁判文书;实证研究;内容分析
英文关键词：judgment document; empirical study; content analysis
中文摘要：
裁判文书上网为研究者提供了观察我国司法实践的便捷途径。通过对重要期刊发表的刑事法文献的内容分析发现，虽然裁判文书上网对法学研究有助推作用，但其尚不能完全满足学术研究探知经验的需求，相关研究在方法运用方面也存在短板。基于裁判文书的研究，在裁判文书获取、抽样、研究设计、数据分析与运用、研究发现与结论适用等方面，存在较多不规范之处，并且缺乏针对裁判文书这一特殊数据来源的特殊方法论关注。考虑到我国法律数据所受的现实环境制约，裁判文书仍将在较长时间内是实证研究的主要数据来源之一。因此，应当在遵循实证研究基本规范的基础上，正确看待裁判文书所能提供的信息，采取多种方式应对裁判文书总体不清、代表性存疑等问题，并迈向真正具备大数据思维的实证研究。
英文摘要：
The online disclosure of judgment documents provides researchers with a convenient way to observe judicial practice. Research findings based on content analysis of criminal law literature published in journals show that online disclosure of judgment documents promotes the development of the jurisprudential study, but cannot fully meet the needs for the exploration of judicial experience, and they also expose the shortcomings of the jurisprudential study in China in the application of research methods. Researches using judgment documents have many deficiencies in document collection, sampling, research design, data analysis, and application of research findings and conclusions, and they fail to pay attention to the special methodology for using judgment documents as a special data source. In view of the actual legal data environment in China, judgment documents will remain the main data source of empirical study for a long period of time. On the basis of following basic research norms of empirical study, Chinese researchers should correctly understand data from judgment documents, adopt various methods to deal with such problems as the questionable representativeness of judgment documents, and move towards research truly with big data thinking.
全文阅读： 点击下载
