重思个人信息权利束的保障机制：行政监管还是民事诉讼
王锡锌重思个人信息权利束的保障机制：行政监管还是民事诉讼
Re-thinking Legal Mechanisms for the Protection of Personal Information Rights:Administrative Regulation or Civil Litigation
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：王锡锌
单位：
中文关键词：个人信息权利束|个人信息处理规则|行政监管|侵权责任|个人信息保护法
英文关键词：a bundle of rights of data subjects|rules for handling personal information|administrative regulation|torts liability|Personal Information Protection Law
中文摘要：
个人在个人信息处理活动中的权利,包括知情、决定、查阅、复制、删除、可携带等权利的集合,是立法为个人配置的个人信息权利束。这些权利并非个人民事权利的逻辑延伸,而是国家为了履行个人信息保护义务,通过制度性保障赋予个人的工具性权利。这些工具性权利与个人信息处理规则在内容上同构,二者共同构成个人信息保护的规制秩序。以行政监管为中心对个人信息权利束进行保障,是个人信息保护法内在逻辑的必然要求,其能够更高效地规制个人信息处理活动,更有效地实现保障个人信息权益和规范信息处理活动的双重目标。以行政监管为中心,并不排斥民事诉讼等私法救济途径。如果违法处理个人信息的行为在侵害个人信息权利束的同时,也侵害了民事实体权益,个人可依法提起侵权之诉。
英文摘要：
The rights of data subjects in personal information processing, including the right to be informed, the right to determine, the right to access, the right to erase, and the right to portability, constitute a bundle of rights of personal information protection. They are not logical extensions of civil rights, but rather instrumental rights given by the state through legislation in order to fulfill the state obligation of protecting personal information. These rights of data subjects correspond with the compliance obligations of data processors, and together they constitute the regulatory order of personal information protection. Logically, this regulatory order demands administrative regulation and supervision as major mechanisms for protecting personal information in order to effectively regulate activities of personal information processing and better achieve the goals of protecting data subjects' rights and interests. These administrative regulation-oriented mechanisms do not preclude civil litigation and other supplementary remedies. Accordingly, if the illegal processing of personal information also results in infringements upon substantive civil rights or interests, the relevant data subjects may institute tort actions for judicial remedy.
全文阅读： 点击下载
