我国知识产权法院的治理实效与制度逻辑

我国知识产权法院的治理实效与制度逻辑

Governance Effectiveness andInstitutional Logic of Intellectual Property Courtsin China

    期刊名称：《法学研究》
    期刊年份：
    作者：陈天昊,苏亦坡
    单位：
    中文关键词：知识产权法院;司法改革;裁判质效;技术调查官;繁简分流
    英文关键词：intellectual property court; judicial reform; efficiency and quality of adjudication; technical investigator; separation of simple cases from complicated cases
    中文摘要：
    运用双重差分法对2011年至2020年上市公司数据进行分析表明，我国于2014年底设立的知识产权法院取得了积极的治理实效，知识产权法院通过裁判提升纠纷解决效率及输出规范资源可以显著促进企业创新。回顾知识产权法院创设、建制及发展的历程可以发现，知识产权法院作为新创设组织面临的合法性压力及其采取的向上回应、横向竞争的行为逻辑，驱使其在过去的实践中努力提升裁判效率及裁判文书质量，这为司法治理发挥实效提供了具体案例，也为后续专门法院的建设及司法改革的推进积累了宝贵经验。知识产权法院在未来仍面临挑战，包括不同行为逻辑交互耦合导致的工作重心不规律摇摆，以及竞争环境下的资源压力可能引发其重新嵌入常规体系，今后的司法改革需对此采取措施审慎应对。
    英文摘要：
    An analysis of innovation and R&D data of listed companies from 2011 to 2020 using the difference-in-difference estimation method shows that the intellectual property courts established in China at the end of 2014 have achieved positive governance effectiveness. Intellectual property courts can play a prominent role in promoting corporate innovation by improving the efficiency of dispute resolution and enhancing normative output through adjudication. A retrospective look at the creation, establishment and development of intellectual property courts reveals that the legitimacy pressures they face as newly created organizations and their behavioral logic of upward response and horizontal competition have together driven their efforts to improve the efficiency and quality of adjudication in the past practice, thereby providing a concrete example of improving the effectiveness of judicial governance and accumulating valuable experience for the subsequent construction of specialized courts and the promotion of judicial reform. Intellectual property courts still face challenges in their future development, including irregular shift in focus due to the interaction and coupling of different behavioral logic and resource pressure in a competitive environment that may trigger their re-embedding in the conventional system, which should be dealt with by further judicial reform through the adoption of prudent measures.
    全文阅读：  点击下载