规制大众传播媒介的回应权：功能延续与制度发展
朱虎规制大众传播媒介的回应权：功能延续与制度发展
Right of Reply as a Means of Regulatingthe Mass Media: Function Continuance and System Development
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：朱虎
单位：
中文关键词：回应权;大众传播媒介;人格尊严;公共领域;表达自由
英文关键词：the right of reply; mass media; personal dignity; public sphere; freedom of expression
中文摘要：
针对传统大众传播媒介的回应权，使被报道者能更有效地维护其人格尊严，并能为公众提供多元化的信息来源。信息时代传播媒介的诸多变化，使个人名誉更易受到影响，更为根本和重要的是加剧了社会的碎片化、极端化并产生了注意力经济，从而将对公共领域造成破坏性影响，由此突显了规制媒体表达自由的必要性。作为规制传播媒介的手段，回应权之名誉保护功能和提供多元化信息来源功能在当今依旧延续甚至更有必要。传统回应权的规制对象应予扩张，使回应权也能够针对类似于大众媒体的用户以及平台媒体、搜索引擎行使，回应权并能成为连接点，结合标签、算法等发挥协同治理的作用。但是，回应权毕竟涉及媒体的表达自由，其具体规则的构建、调整和扩充要实现基本权利之间的合比例关系。
英文摘要：
The right of reply against traditional media enables the reported persons to uphold their personal dignity more effectively and provides a plurality of sources of information. The many changes in the media in the information era have made individuals’ reputations more vulnerable and, more fundamentally and importantly, have had a destructive impact on the public sphere by intensifying the fragmentation and polarization of the society and creating an attention economy, thus necessitating the regulation of the freedom of expression in the media. Today, the right of reply has become a means of regulating the media, and its function of protecting reputation and providing a plurality of sources of information remains and even becomes more necessary. The traditional right of reply should be expanded in terms of its objects of regulation so that it can be exercised against users similar to mass media, media platforms and search engines, and become a connection point and play its role in the cooperative governance together with tagging and algorithms. However, since the right of reply can infringe on the media’s freedom of expression, a proportional relationship between the fundamental rights should be achieved in the construction, adjustment and expansion of its specific rules, so that it can play the regulatory role of both traditional media and new media at the same time.
全文阅读： 点击下载
